Rules About Notaries and Witnesses That Could Invalidate Your Most Important Documents

The Anxiety of the Dotted Line

We’ve all been there: staring at a stack of papers that represent a major life decision—a will, a property deed, a power of attorney—with a pen in hand. It’s the moment of truth, and a quiet anxiety often creeps in. Are we doing this correctly? Is every signature, date, and initial in the right place? More importantly, are you sure you know the difference between a witness and a notary, and when you need them? The rules are more complex—and surprising—than you think.

Getting these details wrong can have serious consequences, from a rejected document to a legal battle that undermines your intentions. This article reveals five counter-intuitive rules and insights from legal and notary experts that everyone should know before signing on the dotted line.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The "Signer Must Be Present" Rule Has a Rare, Risky Exception

The cornerstone of any notarization is the signer's personal appearance before the notary. But in some states, a rare and highly restricted exception exists: proof of execution by a subscribing witness.

This procedure allows a document to be notarized without the principal signer ever meeting the notary. The process works like this: a person signs the document in front of a witness. That witness then appears before a notary, takes an oath confirming they saw the signing, and the notary performs the notarization based on the witness's sworn testimony.

However, states regulate this practice with extreme caution. Before even considering this option, be aware of the strict and varied restrictions:

• Not Authorized: Some states, like Georgia and Washington, do not permit this procedure at all.

• Attorney Required: Pennsylvania requires the subscribing witness to be a licensed attorney within the state.

• Two Witnesses Needed: Tennessee mandates the use of two subscribing witnesses.

• Prohibited for Key Documents: California prohibits using this method for critical documents like powers of attorney and most instruments affecting real property.

Why This Is Surprising and Risky

This exception runs counter to the most fundamental rule of notarization. It is so risky because it bypasses the notary's primary function: to personally verify the signer's identity and volition, the two most critical defenses against fraud and forgery. Failing to require the signer's personal appearance is a leading cause of notary-related lawsuits. While created to accommodate rare emergencies, these strict state controls underscore the immense legal risk involved in bypassing personal appearance, the bedrock of fraud prevention in notarization. This procedure is not a convenient shortcut; it's a highly technical act that should only be performed by notaries who are deeply familiar with their state's specific requirements.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Your Notary Can Be a Witness... Unless You're in a State Where It Invalidates the Document

Many important documents, particularly deeds and mortgages, require the signatures of one or more witnesses in addition to a notary's seal. This leads to a common question: can the notary public also serve as one of the witnesses? The answer is a frustrating "it depends entirely on the state."

This is a critical distinction where a simple mistake can lead to a document being rejected for recording or challenged in court.

In these states, YES, the Notary can act as a witness:

• Connecticut: Requires two witnesses; the notary can serve as one.

• Florida: Requires two witnesses; the notary can serve as one.

• South Carolina: Requires two witnesses; the notary can serve as one.

In these states, NO, the Notary cannot act as a witness:

• Louisiana: Requires two witnesses; neither can be the notary.

• Georgia: Requires one witness for many documents (who cannot be the notary). Note that specific documents, like deeds, may have different requirements.

Why This Distinction Is Critical

Jurisdictions are absolute. If a document is executed in a state where the notary cannot be a witness, but they sign as one anyway, the document may be considered improperly executed. These conflicting state rules represent different approaches to balancing convenience with security; getting it wrong doesn't just create a procedural hiccup—it can undermine the entire legal foundation of a property transfer or other critical transaction. Always confirm the rules for the specific state where the signing occurs.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Why Your Bank Keeps Saying "No" to Witnessing Your Will

One of the most common frustrations in do-it-yourself estate planning is taking a will or trust document to a financial institution. You find a notary, but when you ask them or another employee to act as a witness, you are politely but firmly refused. The reason is simple and has nothing to do with customer service: liability.

Many banks and financial institutions have a strict corporate policy forbidding employees from acting as witnesses for estate planning documents. Witnesses and notaries do more than just watch a signature; they attest that the signer is who they claim to be, signed the document knowingly, and appeared to have the mental capacity to do so at that moment. This role extends beyond the signing table and can lead directly to a courtroom.

If a will is ever challenged in court, the witnesses and the notary are likely to be deposed. Financial institutions want to avoid involving their employees in such legal disputes.

This insight reframes the bank's refusal from a frustrating inconvenience into a calculated business decision to mitigate legal risk. This same principle is why most law firms will refuse to witness or notarize documents they did not draft themselves.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For Some Powerful Documents, A Notary Is Surprisingly Optional

A Power of Attorney (POA) is a document granting someone the authority to make financial or legal decisions on your behalf. Most people assume such a powerful instrument must be notarized to be valid. Surprisingly, that’s not always the case.

Several states offer flexibility, allowing a POA to be finalized with either a notary's seal or the signatures of witnesses. The signer can choose the method that works best for them.

According to state statutes, a Power of Attorney may be finalized with witness signatures instead of notarization in the following states:

• Kentucky

• Michigan

• North Dakota

• Oregon

• Virginia

• Washington

• Wisconsin

• Wyoming

Why This Is Impactful

This flexibility can be a lifesaver in urgent situations. However, it also underscores the absolute importance of verifying requirements. This flexibility highlights a fundamental tension in state law: balancing accessibility for the public against the strict formalities required by financial institutions, which often impose their own rules on top of the law. Even if a POA is legally valid with only witness signatures in your state, a bank or brokerage may have its own internal policy requiring notarization before they will honor it.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Proving a Lost Will Just Got a Little Easier (in Pennsylvania)

What happens when an original, signed will is lost, but a perfect copy exists? For over a century in Pennsylvania, the answer was grim. A rigid legal rule often made it impossible to probate the will, potentially thwarting the deceased's final wishes. But a landmark case, In re: Estate of Isabel Wilner, changed everything.

The original will of Isabel Wilner, who died at 91, was lost. Her attorney, however, had a conformed copy from his files. The case hinged on an old rule requiring two witnesses to prove not only the will's proper execution (that it was signed correctly) but also its contents.

The problem was that subscribing witnesses—the people who watch a will being signed—rarely know what the document says. It is neither necessary nor customary for them to read it. This made the two-witness requirement for proving the contents of a lost will a nearly impossible standard to meet.

In a major decision, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court modernized the rule. The court ruled that the statutory two-witness requirement applies only to proving the will's execution. To prove the contents of a lost will, the court established a new, more practical standard: clear and convincing evidence.

The Significance of This Legal Evolution

This landmark ruling shows the law evolving to favor clear evidence of intent over antiquated procedural hurdles that could be exploited to invalidate a person's last wishes. By shifting the standard, the court acknowledged the modern reality that a lawyer's conformed photocopy is highly reliable evidence. More importantly, it helps prevent a scenario where a "nefarious" person could benefit by intentionally causing a will to go missing, prioritizing the testator’s intent over a rigid rule that no longer served its purpose of preventing fraud.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Conclusion: Sign with Confidence

The world of official documents is governed by a complex and varied web of state laws, where common assumptions are often wrong. From a notary who can also be a witness in one state but not another, to a Power of Attorney that doesn't require a notary at all, the rules are anything but intuitive.

The integrity of your most important life decisions rests on these small details. The next time you sign, don't just ask where to sign—ask who needs to be watching.